07 May 2016

Bitcoin in the News : 2016-04

What a difference a month can make. The main story in the previous month's news roundup, 'Bitcoin's nightmare scenario' (aka the 'hard fork' debate; see Bitcoin in the News : 2016-03) was hardly newsworthy in April. Were we just witnessing marketing hype? Instead of sky-is-falling hysteria, there was routine evolution.

The most repeated stories involved a couple of products. The first product was something called 'lightning'.

Since neither story explained what 'lightning' is, I'll pursue that in a future post. The second product was something called 'steam', which a preliminary story helps to explain.

I don't want to judge whether that is positive or negative for bitcoin, because gambling contains elements of both. What does gambling have to do with steam?

A couple of well known personalities from the U.S. financial scene also made the bitcoin news.

What would a 'Bitcoin in the News' post be without some scandal? Like tax evasion...

Or like bribery...

The word 'myth' also popped up a few times during the month.

  • The New Bitcoin Myth (theatlantic.com); URL: 'bitcoin-hype'; Headline: 'Can Bitcoin Be Used For Good?'; except for the page title, the word 'myth' doesn't appear in the article
  • 7 myths about the Bitcoin blockchain (cio.com.au); 'Myth 1: The blockchain is a magical database in the cloud. Myth 2: The integrity of the ledger is defined by the majority of nodes [...]'

As that last link suggests (and this present post confirms), web 'journalism' is based on lists.

Now I'll look into the crystal ball at 'Bitcoin in the News : 2016-05', because there's one bitcoin story that was, that is, and that ever will be.

I could go on (and on and on), but let's give it a rest. Sap rises in the spring and bitcoin is no exception.

No comments:

Post a Comment